conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #46689: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46689#issuecomment-2940438967
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit b119f5eb5ed87d95e943c912c277f5a2aa4009df. There were 81 benchmark results with an error: - Commit Run on `amd64-m5-4xlarge-linux` at [2025-06-04 00:16:26Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/de93b6265377464c85cfdc9e815d9113...8b607606a9b94c4eb0151a7bd7710909/) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-05, scale_factor=10](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0683fc4515eb7b92800052ea91af1f28) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-07, scale_factor=10](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0683fcbdd8f07eda8000e2291d232e5f) - and 79 more (see the report linked below) There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/43476159110) has more details. It also includes information about 4 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
