zeroshade commented on code in PR #2801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/2801#discussion_r2231296286
##########
go/adbc/pkg/snowflake/driver.go:
##########
@@ -97,7 +97,27 @@ func setErrWithDetails(err *C.struct_AdbcError, adbcError
adbc.Error) {
return
}
+ for i := 0; i < 5; i++ {
+ err.sqlstate[i] = C.char(adbcError.SqlState[i])
+ }
+
if err.vendor_code != C.ADBC_ERROR_VENDOR_CODE_PRIVATE_DATA {
+ // Caller is not interested in `private_data` if `vendor_code`
is not
+ // `ADBC_ERROR_VENDOR_CODE_PRIVATE_DATA` so let's use the field
for
+ // `vendor_code` instead, but make sure it's not set to the
value
+ // that would indicate `private_data` is set.
+ if adbcError.VendorCode !=
C.ADBC_ERROR_VENDOR_CODE_PRIVATE_DATA {
+ err.vendor_code = C.int(adbcError.VendorCode)
+ }
+ setErr(err, adbcError.Msg)
+ return
+ }
+
+ numDetails := len(adbcError.Details)
+ // If there are no details, but we have a `VendorCode`, let's override
+ // `vendor_code` and not populate `private_data` with the error details.
+ if numDetails == 0 && adbcError.VendorCode != 0 && adbcError.VendorCode
!= C.ADBC_ERROR_VENDOR_CODE_PRIVATE_DATA {
+ err.vendor_code = C.int(adbcError.VendorCode)
Review Comment:
Yea, it's strictly an issue with the C interop.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
