Re: [I] So we basically have a 2nd file parser here 🤔 I'm wondering if instead of creating yet-another-parser -- even though it's partial -- we could ask the decoder to provide us a "reason" or a "trace" on the individual read requests. For example, we could extend `AsyncFileReader` with an implemented-by-default method: [arrow-rs]

[via GitHub]

alamb commented on issue #8157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8157#issuecomment-3192084966

   @crepererum says
   - Yes, that's better. You're right that instead of using the async interface 
-- which is just one way to drive the push decoder --, we should use the push 
decoder interface directly to convey the trace/intend 👍


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org