eddelbuettel commented on issue #810: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/issues/810#issuecomment-3339137245
Slick and minimal and great existence proof. One downside, though, is that in order to make this happen you allocated the objects differently. In my ideal world, I would keep the same universality of Arrow object created by `nanoarrow` at C(++) level and pass them whereever I want. And if Python needs special treatment, would it then be possibky to shimmy a conversion layer in "somewhere" as per the earlier email discussion? Can you see a way to tuck the above away somewhere in R package layer? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
