zanmato1984 commented on PR #48267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/48267#issuecomment-3582857140
Hi @tadeja , thanks for working on this. Appreciate it. I'm glad to see we
are adding python bindings for `scatter` and `inverse_permutation`. To your
questions:
> Does it make sense to add Python wrappers/bindings for
`InversePermutationOptions` and `ScatterOptions` already at this point in time?
(Or at all?) What would you say, @felipecrv, @zanmato1984 ?
I think it does make sense to have them.
> Currently both `InversePermutationOptions` and `ScatterOptions` do not
seem to get accepted by `inverse_permutation` and `scatter` as demonstrated in
added tests of
[test_compute.py](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/48267/files#diff-2010b86c11cb90f0ce6ef00648df2e388d11cda5d3fc74e4293dd862e228daecR1607).
I'm not sure what you mean. The underlying C++ APIs will accept those
options. So I would expect no problem for their python bindings. Are you saying
that they are not working?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
