klin333 commented on PR #828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/828#issuecomment-3758563149

   Hi @paleolimbot thank you very much for the work on this. I tried this, and 
yep this indeed solves the crushingly slow gc() i observed in #822. It is still 
a little bit slower than what i tried to do in PR #823 though, but that's fine 
i suppose. 
   
   My understanding is that we are still restreaming, just in C++ and no longer 
in R, sounds good. Just curious though, given we are collecting the stream into 
batches of arrays anyway, why not directly convert the arrays, like what i did 
in 823? Why the restream? 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to