raulcd commented on PR #49475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49475#issuecomment-4031507591

   I am unsure it seems we added coverage here:
   - https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/2050
   
   And then disabled it here:
   - https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5778
   
   It seems the reason, based on the JIRA ticket was:
   > Computing and uploading code coverage data probably makes Travis-CI builds 
even slower. Since the resulting data isn't currently exploited (and 
furthermore partial builds can upload bogus data, e.g. showing some C++ 
uncovered if only R is rebuilt), we should just disable it.
   
   From what I understand it seems we were trying to do a full Arrow coverage 
report (C++, Python, R).
   I think a separate job only for coverage on the Python side could make sense.
   
   @pitrou you worked on adding this coverage in the past, what are your 
thoughts on this?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to