criccomini commented on issue #268: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/issues/268#issuecomment-4347540804
> The question is what (other than shifting the maintenance burden) benefit would we get for putting that implementation in object_store crate itself? I would love to figure this out. As @trungda said, there are a bunch of useful things that a lot of us are having to write over and over again. IMO, it's important for the success of this project to offer such features. This topic is related to https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/issues/14. On the other hand, I'm completely sympathetic to being stretched thin on free+open source work. I, too, am trying to be disciplined about this. But that leaves the project in a funny spot. I might suggest adding a crate to object_store that's got different governance and extra committers, but I'm not at all sure how Apache's model will work with that. As you say, perhaps the best thing is for a bunch of us to coalesce around some other project+package that provides utilities for object_store. But that gets back to who wants to put in the time to drive it; I'm not sure anyone does. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
