Rich-T-kid commented on PR #10317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10317#issuecomment-4983657438

   >it would be good to preserve some of the useful comments as it looks like 
theyre getting lost in the port
   
   Ill add the comments back in
   
   > are there any downstream concerns with replacing what we previously did 
(calling handle_alloc_error()) with just an error and relying on downstream to 
properly handle 
   
   im not sure. I think the best person to ask would be @alamb.
   
   from the docs for 
[handle_alloc_error](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/std/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html)
 
   >  it may either panic (resulting in unwinding or aborting as per 
configuration for all panics), or abort the process (with no unwinding).
   
   it seems that once this branch is hit there isn't much for the process to do 
anyway? in both cases it aborts the process.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to