pearu commented on issue #50842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/50842#issuecomment-5281910027

   Thanks for the offer, and good to have a second voice for (b) — that's the 
direction I'd settled on too.
   
   I am planning to implement it, so I'll take this one. The prerequisite fix 
(#50841) has landed, so the path is clear.
   
   If you'd like something adjacent to pick up: (a) is still potentially worth 
doing as a complement, for code paths that genuinely need a dense array and so 
aren't covered by (b) — `strings_to_categorical` being the obvious one. That's 
separable from this issue. Otherwise, review on the PR once it's up would be 
very welcome.
   
   Worth noting no maintainer has commented on the direction yet, so (b) is 
still two contributors' preference rather than a settled decision — input from 
an Arrow maintainer would be welcome before I get too far in.
   
   ---
   _🤖 Drafted by Claude Code (an AI agent) and reviewed & approved by pearu._
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to