thisisnic commented on code in PR #53946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/53946#discussion_r4292516922


##########
cpp/src/arrow/util/bit_util_test.cc:
##########
@@ -1108,4 +1108,46 @@ TEST(BitUtil, CopyBits) {
                 0b01011010);
 }
 
+TEST(BitUtil, BitWidth) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint8_t{0}), 0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint8_t{1}), 1);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint8_t{2}), 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint8_t{3}), 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint8_t{127}), 7);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint8_t{128}), 8);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(std::numeric_limits<uint8_t>::max()), 8);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint32_t{0}), 0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint32_t{1} << 20), 21);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth((uint32_t{1} << 20) - 1), 20);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()), 32);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint64_t{0}), 0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint64_t{1} << 40), 41);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth((uint64_t{1} << 40) - 1), 40);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(uint64_t{1} << 63), 64);
+  EXPECT_EQ(bit_util::BitWidth(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()), 64);
+
+  // constexpr-evaluable.
+  static_assert(bit_util::BitWidth(uint16_t{0x0100}) == 9);
+}
+
+TEST(BitUtil, HasSingleBit) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint8_t{0}));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint8_t{1}));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint8_t{2}));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint8_t{3}));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint8_t{128}));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(std::numeric_limits<uint8_t>::max()));
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint32_t{1} << 20));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(bit_util::HasSingleBit((uint32_t{1} << 20) + 1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint64_t{1} << 63));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(bit_util::HasSingleBit(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()));
+
+  // constexpr-evaluable.
+  static_assert(bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint16_t{0x0100}));
+  static_assert(!bit_util::HasSingleBit(uint16_t{0x0101}));
+}

Review Comment:
   I feel like this is overtesting given that on most platforms are using the 
existing functions internally, so I'll trim this down



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to