rustyconover opened a new pull request, #967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/967

   `ArrowIpcEncoderSetMessageMetadata()` (#924, narrowed in #937) attaches 
`Message::custom_metadata` to the next message an encoder encodes. An 
`ArrowIpcWriter` keeps its encoder private, though, so a caller using the 
writer has no way to attach metadata to the RecordBatch messages it writes. The 
only option is to drop down to the encoder and redo the writer's framing, 
footer bookkeeping and dictionary handling by hand.
   
   This PR adds `ArrowIpcWriterSetMessageMetadata(writer, metadata, error)`. 
The writer holds the metadata and attaches it to the next RecordBatch message 
written by `ArrowIpcWriterWriteArrayView()` or 
`ArrowIpcWriterWriteArrayStream()`. The metadata applies to that one message. 
Passing `NULL` clears metadata that has been set but not yet written. Like the 
encoder function, it takes ownership of the buffer.
   
   The metadata is held by the writer rather than set on the encoder right 
away. Setting it on the encoder would attach it to whichever message is encoded 
next, and that can be a DictionaryBatch written ahead of the batch. This 
happens both with an explicit `ArrowIpcWriterWriteDictionaryBatch()` call and 
inside `ArrowIpcWriterWriteArrayStream()`. RecordBatch-level metadata belongs 
on the RecordBatch, so the writer passes it to the encoder just before encoding 
that batch.
   
   Things worth a look in review:
   
   - With `WriteArrayStream()` the metadata lands on the first RecordBatch 
only. Per-batch metadata over a stream would need a callback or a per-array 
side channel, which seemed out of scope. The batch-at-a-time pattern is 
`SetMessageMetadata()` + `WriteArrayView()`.
   - #928 makes encoder-level metadata apply to DictionaryBatch messages too. 
The two compose: this PR never sets encoder metadata until right before the 
RecordBatch is encoded. They touch neighbouring code in `writer.c`, so 
whichever lands second will need a small rebase. I can do that.
   
   Motivation: I'm moving the IPC layer of a DuckDB extension from Arrow C++ to 
nanoarrow. Its RPC protocol carries per-batch state in RecordBatch 
`custom_metadata` (what Arrow C++ writes for 
`RecordBatchWriter::WriteRecordBatch(batch, custom_metadata)`), and this was 
the one thing the writer couldn't express.
   
   Tests:
   - `MessageMetadataAttachesToNextRecordBatch` sets metadata, writes a 
DictionaryBatch and then a RecordBatch, and checks that only the RecordBatch 
carries it. It also checks that the following batch doesn't inherit the 
metadata, and that set-then-cleared metadata is never written.
   - `MessageMetadataWithArrayStream` covers `WriteArrayStream()` writing its 
own dictionaries.
   
   ctest passes locally (macOS arm64, Debug, ZSTD/LZ4, 390 tests). The IPC 
writer, encoder and files tests are clean under ASan/UBSan.
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to