baumgold commented on pull request #277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/277#issuecomment-1039698085


   Could someone please approve running CI again?
   
   As a side-note, it appears that the main branch currently produces failing 
tests with Julia v1.3 and v1.4 (note that all tests pass in v1.5, v1.6, and 
v1.7).  The relevant stacktrace is below.  Does anyone have any idea when this 
regression was introduced?
   
   ```julia
   misc: Error During Test at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/test/runtests.jl:98
     Got exception outside of a @test
     TaskFailedException:
     MethodError: no method matching 
resize!(::Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}, 
::Int64)
     Closest candidates are:
       resize!(!Matched::Array{T,1} where T, ::Integer) at array.jl:1017
       resize!(!Matched::BitArray{1}, ::Integer) at bitarray.jl:773
       resize!(!Matched::PooledArray{T,R,1,RA} where RA, ::Integer) where {T, 
R} at ~/.julia/packages/PooledArrays/DuIZ1/src/PooledArrays.jl:284
       ...
     Stacktrace:
      [1] 
_append!(::Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}, 
::Base.HasLength, ::Tuple{Int64}) at ./array.jl:921
      [2] 
append!(::Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}, 
::Tuple{Int64}) at ./array.jl:915
      [3] 
push!(::Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}, 
::Int64) at ./array.jl:916
      [4] 
push!(::SentinelArrays.ChainedVector{Int64,Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}},
 ::Int64) at ~/.julia/packages/SentinelArrays/pYV2X/src/chainedvector.jl:458
      [5] 
append!(::SentinelArrays.ChainedVector{Int64,Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}},
 
::Arrow.DictEncoded{Int64,Int8,SentinelArrays.ChainedVector{Int64,Arrow.Primitive{Int64,Array{Int64,1}}}})
 at ~/.julia/packages/SentinelArrays/pYV2X/src/chainedvector.jl:615
      [6] (::Arrow.var"#87#92"{Array{Any,1},Arrow.Table})(::Int64) at 
~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/src/table.jl:288
      [7] foreach(::Arrow.var"#87#92"{Array{Any,1},Arrow.Table}, 
::UnitRange{Int64}) at ./abstractarray.jl:1920
      [8] macro expansion at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/src/table.jl:287 
[inlined]
      [9] (::Arrow.var"#84#89"{Arrow.Table,Channel{Task}})() at 
./threadingconstructs.jl:113
     Stacktrace:
      [1] wait at ./task.jl:251 [inlined]
      [2] #Table#83(::Bool, ::Type{Arrow.Table}, ::Array{Arrow.ArrowBlob,1}) at 
~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/src/table.jl:358
      [3] Table at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/src/table.jl:271 [inlined]
      [4] 
#Table#78(::Base.Iterators.Pairs{Union{},Union{},Tuple{},NamedTuple{(),Tuple{}}},
 ::Type{Arrow.Table}, ::Base.GenericIOBuffer{Array{UInt8,1}}, ::Int64, 
::Nothing) at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/src/table.jl:265
      [5] Table at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/src/table.jl:265 [inlined] 
(repeats 2 times)
      [6] top-level scope at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/test/runtests.jl:294
      [7] top-level scope at 
/buildworker/worker/package_linux64/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/Test/src/Test.jl:1107
      [8] top-level scope at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/test/runtests.jl:101
      [9] top-level scope at 
/buildworker/worker/package_linux64/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/Test/src/Test.jl:1107
      [10] top-level scope at ~/.julia/packages/Arrow/rVa71/test/runtests.jl:39
      [11] include at ./boot.jl:328 [inlined]
      [12] include_relative(::Module, ::String) at ./loading.jl:1105
      [13] include(::Module, ::String) at ./Base.jl:31
      [14] include(::String) at ./client.jl:424
      [15] top-level scope at none:6
      [16] eval(::Module, ::Any) at ./boot.jl:330
      [17] exec_options(::Base.JLOptions) at ./client.jl:263
      [18] _start() at ./client.jl:460
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to