carlpayne commented on issue #25794: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/25794#issuecomment-1466356713
@aromanenko-dev great question! I just did some further testing, with the following results: | Beam Version | Result | | ------------- | ------------- | | 2.34.0 | ✅ | | 2.35.0 | ✅ | | 2.36.0 | ✅ | | 2.37.0 | ✅ | | 2.38.0 | ✅ | | 2.39.0 | ✅ | | 2.40.0 | ✅ | | 2.41.0 | ✅ | | 2.42.0 | ✅ | | 2.43.0 | ❌ | | 2.44.0 | ❌| | 2.45.0 | ❌ | | 2.46.0 | ❌ | So, it seems the regression first came in with `2.43.0`. My guess is that perhaps [this](https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/a6cda1370b31dfd585c37c5066b89c4498158793#diff-7bb94a476b713856a79e36e38e680d580f12b9060e8e3a613b74137bc5f5c9c2) change might be the cause, as it was introduced during `2.43.0` and is the first time we see `SeekableChannelInput`, which appears in the stacktrace I added previously when dealing with zipped files. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
