Polber commented on PR #32956: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/32956#issuecomment-2452675764
> R: @Polber > > We could call this "ValidateWithSchema" if we think that's not too verbose and other types of validation may be added in the future. @robertwb I missed this before. I think either works. The Validate transform could also have different parameters for different validation cases. But I think in general it never hurts to be descriptive, so I suppose I am in favor of "ValidateWithSchema". Follows the ReadFromX, WriteToX, MapToFields, etc. cadence -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
