github-actions[bot] opened a new issue, #36624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/36624

   
     Performance change found in the
     test: 
`pytorch_image_classification_benchmarks-resnet101-mean_load_model_latency_milli_secs`
 for the metric: `mean_load_model_latency_milli_secs`.
   
     For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
     `Triage performance alert issues` section of the 
[README](https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/python/apache_beam/testing/analyzers/README.md#triage-performance-alert-issues).
   
   
   `Test description:` Pytorch image classification on 50k images of size 224 x 
224 with resnet 101.
   Test link - 
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/42d0a6e3564d8b9c5d912428a6de18fb22a13ac1/.test-infra/jenkins/job_InferenceBenchmarkTests_Python.groovy#L34
   Test dashboard - 
http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/ZpS8Uf44z/python-ml-runinference-benchmarks?orgId=1&viewPanel=7
   
   
   ```
   
   timestamp: Sat Oct 25 07:05:44 2025, metric_value: 78584.49
   timestamp: Fri Oct 24 18:25:11 2025, metric_value: 92706.41
   timestamp: Fri Oct 24 10:49:31 2025, metric_value: 93639.36 <---- Anomaly
   timestamp: Thu Oct 23 23:51:02 2025, metric_value: 85854.42
   timestamp: Wed Oct  8 22:15:12 2025, metric_value: 83701.28
   timestamp: Sat Sep 13 06:57:47 2025, metric_value: 91354.80
   timestamp: Fri Sep 12 06:56:48 2025, metric_value: 87093.69
   timestamp: Thu Sep 11 07:10:14 2025, metric_value: 84028.75
   timestamp: Wed Sep 10 07:05:41 2025, metric_value: 83676.43
   timestamp: Tue Sep  9 06:49:21 2025, metric_value: 85972.96
   timestamp: Mon Sep  8 06:57:09 2025, metric_value: 88489.85
   timestamp: Sat Sep  6 06:51:18 2025, metric_value: 86028.16
   timestamp: Thu Sep  4 07:14:52 2025, metric_value: 87518.97
   
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to