github-actions[bot] opened a new issue, #38495:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/38495

   
     Performance change found in the
     test: `cogbk_python_batch_load_test_reiterate_4times_10KB_values` for the 
metric: `runtime`.
   
     For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
     `Triage performance alert issues` section of the 
[README](https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/python/apache_beam/testing/analyzers/README.md#triage-performance-alert-issues).
   
   
   `Test description:` CoGroupByKey Python Load test - reiterate 4 times 10kB 
values
   python | coGBK | reiteration 10kB value
   Test Link - 
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/5e38decf9e723a385057131b01bbd33d8c60bda3/.test-infra/jenkins/job_LoadTests_coGBK_Python.groovy#L96
   Test Dashboard - 
http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/fK0U4JqWz/cogbk-load-tests?orgId=1&var-processingType=batch&var-sdk=python&viewPanel=4
   
   
   ```
   
   timestamp: Wed May 13 17:04:29 2026, metric_value: 143.00
   timestamp: Tue May 12 16:53:14 2026, metric_value: 143.00
   timestamp: Mon May 11 17:07:55 2026, metric_value: 131.00 <---- Anomaly
   timestamp: Sun May 10 16:26:05 2026, metric_value: 91.00
   timestamp: Sat May  9 16:27:32 2026, metric_value: 94.00
   timestamp: Fri May  8 16:36:49 2026, metric_value: 183.00
   timestamp: Thu May  7 16:58:00 2026, metric_value: 107.00
   timestamp: Wed May  6 16:50:53 2026, metric_value: 125.00
   timestamp: Tue May  5 16:44:47 2026, metric_value: 85.00
   timestamp: Mon May  4 16:33:07 2026, metric_value: 78.00
   timestamp: Sun May  3 16:08:55 2026, metric_value: 82.00
   timestamp: Sat May  2 16:12:39 2026, metric_value: 83.00
   timestamp: Thu Apr 30 17:35:29 2026, metric_value: 109.00
   
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to