phillipleblanc commented on code in PR #10259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10259#discussion_r1581741974
##########
datafusion/core/src/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs:
##########
@@ -1723,21 +1727,30 @@ pub(crate) mod tests {
/// * `REPARTITION_FILE_MIN_SIZE` (optional) - minimum file size to
repartition
Review Comment:
```suggestion
/// * `REPARTITION_FILE_MIN_SIZE` (optional) - minimum file size to
repartition
/// * `PREFER_EXISTING_UNION` (optional) - if true, will not attempt to
convert Union to Interleave
```
##########
datafusion/core/src/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs:
##########
@@ -1192,7 +1192,11 @@ fn ensure_distribution(
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
let children_plans = children.iter().map(|c|
c.plan.clone()).collect::<Vec<_>>();
- plan = if plan.as_any().is::<UnionExec>() &&
can_interleave(children_plans.iter()) {
+
+ plan = if plan.as_any().is::<UnionExec>()
+ && !config.optimizer.prefer_existing_union
Review Comment:
Given that one of the motivations
(https://github.com/influxdata/arrow-datafusion/pull/4) for this new flag is to
preserve the sorting of the Union - would re-using the existing flag
`prefer_existing_sort` make sense here?
One argument against that would be if you wanted `prefer_existing_sort:
false` and `prefer_existing_union: true`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
