jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10560:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10560#discussion_r1611644593


##########
datafusion-examples/examples/udaf_expr.rs:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+
+use datafusion::{
+    execution::{
+        config::SessionConfig,
+        context::{SessionContext, SessionState},
+    },
+    functions_aggregate::{expr_fn::first_value, register_all},
+};
+
+use datafusion_common::Result;
+use datafusion_expr::col;
+
+#[tokio::main]
+async fn main() -> Result<()> {
+    let ctx = SessionContext::new();
+    let config = SessionConfig::new();
+    let mut state = SessionState::new_with_config_rt(config, 
ctx.runtime_env());
+    let _ = register_all(&mut state);
+
+    let first_value_udaf = 
state.aggregate_functions().get("FIRST_VALUE").unwrap();
+    let first_value_builder = first_value_udaf

Review Comment:
   I'm thinking maybe we change the existing expr::fn to builder mode too.
   
   I expect there are two ways to build Expr
   `first_value(arg).order_by.build()`
   and
   `first_value_uda.call().order_by.build()`
   
   I suggest we force to use builder mode for aggregate and window function 
given there are many arguments to build Expr. Leave scalar function as it is. 
@alamb What do you think?



##########
datafusion-examples/examples/udaf_expr.rs:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+
+use datafusion::{
+    execution::{
+        config::SessionConfig,
+        context::{SessionContext, SessionState},
+    },
+    functions_aggregate::{expr_fn::first_value, register_all},
+};
+
+use datafusion_common::Result;
+use datafusion_expr::col;
+
+#[tokio::main]
+async fn main() -> Result<()> {
+    let ctx = SessionContext::new();
+    let config = SessionConfig::new();
+    let mut state = SessionState::new_with_config_rt(config, 
ctx.runtime_env());
+    let _ = register_all(&mut state);
+
+    let first_value_udaf = 
state.aggregate_functions().get("FIRST_VALUE").unwrap();
+    let first_value_builder = first_value_udaf

Review Comment:
   I'm thinking maybe we change the existing expr::fn to builder mode too.
   
   I expect there are two ways to build Expr
   `first_value(arg).order_by.build()`
   and
   `first_value_udad.call().order_by.build()`
   
   I suggest we force to use builder mode for aggregate and window function 
given there are many arguments to build Expr. Leave scalar function as it is. 
@alamb What do you think?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org

Reply via email to