eliaperantoni commented on code in PR #14521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14521#discussion_r1946209619
##########
datafusion/sql/tests/cases/diagnostic.rs:
##########
@@ -201,14 +201,8 @@ fn test_ambiguous_reference() -> Result<()> {
let diag = do_query(query);
assert_eq!(diag.message, "column 'first_name' is ambiguous");
assert_eq!(diag.span, Some(spans["a"]));
- assert_eq!(
- diag.notes[0].message,
- "possible reference to 'first_name' in table 'a'"
- );
- assert_eq!(
- diag.notes[1].message,
- "possible reference to 'first_name' in table 'b'"
- );
+ assert_eq!(diag.notes[0].message, "possible column a.first_name");
+ assert_eq!(diag.notes[1].message, "possible column b.first_name");
Review Comment:
What would happened if a very similar column (e.g. `first_neme`) was in
scope. I guess they would see `"possible column a.first_neme"` even though
there wasn't really ambiguity there because the planner didn't match that
column.
I don't think this is desirable. What do you think @comphead @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
