I've reset my master to what's in Pieter's.  Since this is most inline with the 
state of lighthouse, it's probably the best place to start.  We should probably 
re-evaluate what's scheduled for 0.8 since there's a lot of code that's ready 
or near ready that doesn't necessarily line up with what's scheduled.  I have 
access to the lighthouse project now, so I can start to work on this.  

I've also done a bunch of work to move the website into github pages.  It seems 
there are a few things lacking to support this as simply as I'd like right now, 
but I'm going to see if I can't work with the jekyll guys to get the things I 
need added.  You can see where that work is in my gh-pages branch.  Getting the 
website moved over is important so we can remove the dependency on Pieter to do 
releases through sparkle.

Once the website goes up, I'd like to clean up what's in master and anything 
else that's ready and deploy an update.  The version that most people are using 
is very old. We'll use that as an opportunity to change the sparkle feed point 
to the new site.

-dave

On Mar 10, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Dave Grijalva wrote:

> Since everything in your master is additive to pieter's, it seems like it 
> would be easiest to start with his and begin merging in your changes a 
> feature at a time.
> 
> -dave
> 
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 6:15 PM, Nathan Kinsinger wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Kevin LaCoste wrote:
>> 
>>> 1. Do you currently have "work in progess" in your master branch?
>> 
>> No, all my current work is in a new branch based off Pieter's master. There 
>> are still a few features/ideas I would like to pull from that branch but 
>> they all need to be reworked first.
>> 
>>> 2. Do you think it's stable enough to become the new base for our efforts?
>>> 
>>> If you believe so then it might be a good starting point for us to focus 
>>> our efforts on. If it's too "messy" as Pieter commented to you or 
>>> containing features that aren't quite complete, then it might be better to 
>>> start with Pieter's fork and generate clean patches of your completed 
>>> features to merge in.
>> 
>> 
>> My intention has been to create a branch that Pieter would want to include 
>> in the next release. As such it is clean (well, the last bits will be soon) 
>> and all the features are complete. I don't know that I can say whether 
>> everything can be included as is. That would be up to the project leader, 
>> which is Dave now I guess. But since it is based on Pieter's master we can 
>> start there and decided how much of my work to include later.
>> 
>> 
>> --Nathan
>> 
>> http://brotherbard.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to