Paolo wrote: > > Il mar, 2003-05-27 alle 21:08, Joaquin Cuenca Abela ha scritto: > > Paolo wrote: > > > > > > Il lun, 2003-05-26 alle 23:36, Mark Finlay ha scritto: > > > > Glade3 is looking really nice, the mdi is great, hope to > > > see support > > > > for "recently opened projects", but the basic UI is still > > > the same :/ > > > > > > > > > > support for recent project is not difficult to add, but currently > > > glade-3 depends only on gtk (no gnome libs dependencies) while > > > egg-recent is gnome specific... We tried to not have #ifdef GNOME > > > around but maybe we can make an exception here... what do > you think? > > > > I don't care too much if we depend on egg until we release > a version, > > as anyway nobody but developers are supposed to use the cvs > version. > > But we should drop the dependency as soon as we release. > > > > The used code from egg will then be copy & pasted. It sucks, but I > > don't want to depend on an unstable library. > > As already pointed out libegg is always cut and pasted, but > what I was talking about is something else: the eggrecent > infrastructure, when ready, will be moved to libgnome not > into gtk because is gnome specific and I don't think it works > on Windows: so if we use it we'll have to ifdef it out.
Ok, thanks for the precision. I don't think that we should depend on libgnome only due to egg-recent. As you point out, that would mean that we should maintain two different versions, and that just to prevent the copy&paste of this code (copy&paste that we should do anyway if we add the functionality right now). If in the future we need more functionalities provided by libgnome, then I will change my mind, but the benefice right now is close to none and doesn't justify an additional dependency. Cheers, _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
