--- James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13/01/04 04:47, Tim M�ller wrote: > > GMarkupParser only accepts a small subset of valid > XML files. Is that > subset good enough? Some of the things not > supported include: > > * files in encodings other than UTF-8 > * entities other than >, < and & > * anything related to DTDs ... > > What limitations do other glade file consumers have? > What features do > glade file producers produce?
I don't know of a lot of glade consumers/producers. To my knowledge the list includes: * glade2 * glade3 * libglade * glade2c * edalg On glade3 I would like to stick to the XML subset readable by GMarkupParser. edalg doesn't work well enough to be important, and anyway it produces GMarkupParser compliant glade files. Cheers, ===== Joaquin Cuenca Abela e98cuenc at yahoo dot com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
