Are there any cases yet where you would want to refuse the change but not have a set_function?
-Shane On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:37:14 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > During my struggle with GtkTable, I found a bug (which I havent entered into > bugzilla), and it take a slight design enhancement to fix, here is the bug: > > - Create a table of size 3x3 (for example) > - Add a widget to the last position (bottom right) > - Decrease the dimentions of the table > > Now we have an orphaned GladeWidget. > > I'd like to implement a "verify_property" function to complement > "set_funciton" and "get_function" in order to refuse to decrese these > dimentions. > > Another option would be to make set_property return boolean except it > wouldn't offer flexability to dissallow values that have no custom set_property > method... > > What do people think ? > > Cheers, > -Tristan > _______________________________________________ > Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel > -- Shane Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
