Jeff Westerinen wrote:
> There seem to be some files in the latest distribution that get
> regenerated during the build. One such file is gtk+.xml which is
> generated from gtk+.xml.in. Are those files there for a good reason, or
> should they be removed?
Open invitation here for autofoo savy people to step in
- gtk+.xml is generated from gtk+.xml.in by the rule that generates
entries in the po files for translation and is basicly a version
of gtk+.xml.in without the leading underscores on some properties/tags.
- I once added the .in files to some install data set in a meager hope
to one day pass "make distcheck"; which was complaining about missing
.in files.
My [mis]understanding is that "make distcheck" requires us to mark all
kinds of unrelated crap for installation if it's to pass - so to pass
distcheck is to further break the build by adding more useless garbage
to the install proceedure...
Cheers,
-Tristan
_______________________________________________
Glade-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
