On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:46 +0100, Oliver Nittka wrote: > e forward declarations seemed actually neccessary to me, > they were all resolved by just expanding the actual definition by its > common name and a typedef.
Isn't this duplicating the definition? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
