On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:45 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mathias Hasselmann and Jan Arne Petersen have recently been working on a > > tool palette widget, aiming to get it into a future version of GTK+. We > > use it in the unstable branch of Glom. It was originally based on the > > Glade tool palette, so you seem like ideal candidate to try to use it. > > That would maybe give it enough testing to get into GTK+. > > Sounds good, I'll be happy to review patches to that effect, although > I wonder, you propose to add it in a branch ?
Maybe. I'd like to avoid doing this work myself. Sorry, I'm just short on time. > can we depend on libegg > (i.e. is libegg in gnome releases ?) The idea of libegg is that you copy the files into your own project, and keep copying them when they are improved in libegg. libegg is never installed so it can't be a normal dependency. > glade requires right now that the palette allow us to iterate through the > palette items to set their tooltips and sensitive state (in > gtkbuillder situations, I guess that's possible already. It's derived from GtkContainer. > deprecated widgets are disabled), we also have those different text/icon > viewing modes... Yeah, EggToolPalette supports that via the GtkToolShell interface: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/GtkToolShell.html Remember, we based it on your tool palette because it seemed like the most sane one, which was already fairly generically coded. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
