On 8 March 2017 at 16:29, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote:

> GLAM-Wiki community, loosely defined, would like to be involved in
>> consulting for the Wikimedia Strategy process - as a voice in its own
>> right.[...]
>>
>
> We are asking for at least one person from each organized group to
>> volunteer to be the Discussion Coordinator.
>>
>
> What qualifies as one "organized group"? Are there additional related
> ones, beyonf the "GLAM community"?
>
> Nemo


Ciao Nemo,

To quote Nicole:

> Track A addresses not only officially registered affiliates but also 
> semi-organized
> groups, like for example Wiki Loves Monuments.


GLAMwiki a.k.a. Cultural Partnerships, is not a formally defined group in
the sense of being a Wikimedia affiliate organisation* but its the kind of
specific interest 'sub-community' within the movement that often has its
own needs and views. Of course, the individuals within any group might
actually feel affiliated to several overlapping kinds of identities within
the movement - and that's ok.
To learn more about Track A visit:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Track_A
To learn about the Strategy process in general and all four 'tracks' visit:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017

-Liam / Wittylama


* (with the exception of some official affiliates like the US GLAM
Consortium user group, and GLAM Macedonia user group)
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam

Reply via email to