This GLAMlist has been vital to my projects on Commons, thanks to the kind
help of you experts. I hope that though the name of the list may change, a
practical facility like this remains available at any rate.

Recently, a then still buggy Pattypan made inroads in the Netherlands -
the list might also support Pattypan?

Thanks a lot, regards, hans muller

User:Hansmuller


Op Ma, 15 mei, 2017 5:28 pm schreef Jane Darnell:
> If it's not too personal maybe you could open it up for uploaders of all
> sorts, because we will be hosting data on Commons soon, according to the
> reports
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> As there has only been one response, on the Commons VP, suggesting that
>>  Commons-l is sufficient to discuss tools and reports in a more general
>>  way, I'll look further at closing down the list.
>>
>> I'd like to keep the archive open as a referenceable record in the
>> future, such as linking from Phabricator. I'll check how the archive
>> works before acting. Any links to this list can be adapted to suggest
>> Commons-l as appropriate, I have already amended the main GWT page on
>> Commons.
>>
>>
>> This has been a successful list, and many usability and some complex
>> technical issues that were resolved here. For all those that took part in
>> various ways, thank you for your interest and support! See you on-wiki.
>> :-)
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Fae
>> --
>> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>>
>> On 10 May 2017 at 13:39, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> * https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools *
>>>
>>>
>>> The glamtools list we created a couple of years ago, after launching
>>> the GLAM wiki toolset, has recently had very few users asking questions
>>> about tools.
>>>
>>> On behalf of the list mods, I invite feedback on whether the list
>>> should be re-promoted as a useful but more general discussion about
>>> Wikimedia Commons batch upload tools, techniques and issues. For
>>> example it could be the recommended email list for all tools listed at
>>>  Commons:Upload tools[1] and for GLAM related tools such as those
>>> listed on Outreach[2]. Alternatively, if the feeling is we have enough
>>>  lists and notice boards that do this job, this may be the right time
>>>  to close the list down and refer users elsewhere.
>>>
>>> Though it costs nothing to run the email list, and past discussions
>>> have been useful, there is a small volunteer cost in admin time to keep
>>> an eye on the moderation queue.
>>>
>>> If you prefer to discuss on-wiki, see the Commons VP thread.[3]
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_tools
>>> 2. https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Resources/Tools
>>> 3. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#
>>>
>> GLAMTOOLS_email_list
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Fae
>>> --
>>> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glamtools mailing list
>> Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Glamtools mailing list
> Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>
>



_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools

Reply via email to