Hi Simon:
> What's wrong with using 'ghc-3.02 -M' for dependencies
I didn't think of it, that's what. ;-)
> and 'ghc-2.01' for compiling, if you really want to keep 2.10 around?
I don't, and as soon as I convince everyone else around here of the
same... I don't think the above combination works, though -- changes
to things like syslibs will flummox the different version when it tries
to read interface files to create the deps. But ghc-2.10 -M ought
to work, AFAIK...
> You could argue that mkdependHS should go in the lib directory, since
> there's no need to call it directly anymore. I'd buy that.
OK, I'll argue that, then. ;-)
Slainte,
Alex.
