RE: GHC 4.01 FFI another bug -- more details

[Manuel M. T. Chakravarty]

"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,

> "Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> 
> > Thanks for the report. Yep, the 4.01 code generator doesn't
> > generate correct code for _casm_GC_ expressions. This bug
> > was fixed some time ago (and will be included in 4.02)
> > It's available via the CVS repository should you depend
> > on having a working _ccall_GC_ impl right now though.
> 
> So far, I manage by using `unsafe' in most places and
> luckily the few places where I needed _ccall_GC_, the
> function only had one argument :-)

Ok, I take this back, segvs today :-(

I recall that Sven mentioned, the current CVS snapshot
doesn't work for him.  Can I get just this fix out of CVS?
(Maybe a stupid question, but I haven't used CVS so far --
RCS has always served me fine.)

Thanks,

Manuel