"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > "Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > > Thanks for the report. Yep, the 4.01 code generator doesn't > > generate correct code for _casm_GC_ expressions. This bug > > was fixed some time ago (and will be included in 4.02) > > It's available via the CVS repository should you depend > > on having a working _ccall_GC_ impl right now though. > > So far, I manage by using `unsafe' in most places and > luckily the few places where I needed _ccall_GC_, the > function only had one argument :-) Ok, I take this back, segvs today :-( I recall that Sven mentioned, the current CVS snapshot doesn't work for him. Can I get just this fix out of CVS? (Maybe a stupid question, but I haven't used CVS so far -- RCS has always served me fine.) Thanks, Manuel
RE: GHC 4.01 FFI another bug -- more details
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:32:03 +0100 (MET)
- RE: GHC 4.01 FFI another bug -- more details Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: GHC 4.01 FFI another bug -- more det... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: GHC 4.01 FFI another bug -- more... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: GHC 4.01 FFI another bug -- more det... Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)