On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:39:50PM +0100, Sven Panne wrote: > > that my PostScript is generated via fop (version 0.20.5) and Ian's via the > PassiveTeX route. I have seen varying versions of DocBook + PassiveTeX > breaking in various wonderful & arcane ways in the past, so I recommend > installing fop. The configure process will prefer fop if it finds it, just > for that reason, BTW.
fop is not an option for me(Debian) as it apparently requires non-free Java stuff. The xmltex bug looks well-known (e.g. Debian bugs #170477, #181444, #184072, #184086, #234884), and the reports point out that running "pdfxmltex happy.fo; pdftops happy.pdf" works (although the output doesn't look /quite/ right, e.g. "- -4pc - -4pc" appears at the top of each page). Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
