Bugs item #1194393, was opened at 2005-05-03 11:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zooko You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1194393&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Zooko O'Whielacronx (zooko) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: segmentation fault Initial Comment: http://bugs.darcs.net//Ticket/Display.html?id=367 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Zooko O'Whielacronx (zooko) Date: 2005-06-10 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=52562 For what it is worth, I haven't gotten any of these errors since I stopped trying to use darcs on lots of large binary patches containing 100's of MB per patch. So I suspect the bug is triggered by certain memory usage patterns... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Marlow (simonmar) Date: 2005-05-03 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48280 If the darcs devs can confirm that this is most likely a bug in GHC, as opposed to a bug in darcs due to use of FFI or unsafeWhatNot, then we'll look into it. We need a repro case (the repository that caused the failure, at least), and the same darcs sources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1194393&group_id=8032 _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
