On 09 August 2005 17:16, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > I'm not against this, although you can work around the problem by > adding a library that defines the missing type classes (Typeable8, > Typeable9 etc), and making your compiler generate the instance > itself. There is nothing magic about 'deriving'; it's just > convenient.
If the arity is >7, couldn't we just generate a Typeable instance, rather than the TypeableN instance? It would mean you wouldn't get the benefits of TypeableN, but at least you'd have Typeable. Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs