Hello, Thanks everybody. However, I believe that using a modified readline library is debatable, mainly because it adds the burden of keeping this library up-to-date to the GHC maintenance process. Having a renamed library is one thing and it does not seem that also modifying the contents of the library is an improvement. For me to consider this idea, it should be the very last solution, every other stone having been turned. And I certainly believe that stones remain to be turned in this case.
I would very much like to hear your comments to this. In addition, if you must replace this framework with another with different contents, I would suggest the use of some versioning scheme. Otherwise is seems that a lot of confusion could result. Thanks and best regards Thorkil On Thursday 03 January 2008 16:18, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:41:56PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote: > > > > Judah's framework (2342543 Bytes) > > http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jjacobson/ghc/GNUreadline-framework.zip > > > > should replace (my old one) > > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/mac_frameworks/GNUreadline-framework.zip > > Done! > > > Thanks > Ian > > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs