#7157: 'let' keyword optional in do notation
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: Oblosys | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.1-rc1
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
Os: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple
Failure: None/Unknown | Difficulty: Unknown
Testcase: | Blockedby:
Blocking: | Related:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by igloo):
* status: new => closed
* difficulty: => Unknown
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Thanks for the suggestion.
However, looking at http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-
cafe/2012-August/102744.html this proposal seems to me to make the
language more complex (in particular, which bindings share a scope is less
transparent), for little or no gain, so I'm closing as wontfix.
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7157#comment:1>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
