You are right that we promised this a while ago, and have not delivered. I'm sorry about that. I, for one, had not appreciated how important it was to you. We are planning to release 4.04 this week, but this thread stuff just won't make it in. We'll do it right after the release, modulo holidays. In practice that means "sometime in August". Is that enough for you? Simon > -----Original Message----- > From: George Russell > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_! > > > I would like to add my strong support, as the person in charge of > transferring the UniForM workbench, for the implementation of > wait functions on input and output handles and input on Posix.FD > which don't block everything else to be done urgently. I think > I suggested this in May, and was told it was coming soon > but it still hasn't appeared. Otherwise it is possible that the > entire UniForM project may be held up for lack of this simple > facility. >
RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_!
Simon Peyton-Jones Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:56:46 +0200 (MET DST)
- I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_! Peter Amstutz
- RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_! Simon Marlow
- RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preempti... Peter Amstutz
- RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_! Simon Marlow
- RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preempti... Peter I Amstutz
- RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_! Simon Marlow
- RE: I thought concurrent haskell was _preemptive_! George Russell
- Re: I thought concurrent haskell was _preempti... Michael Weber
- Simon Peyton-Jones