Ping!
At 2002-05-14 07:17, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>Ashley writes
>
>| > I was hoping to do something similar for 'do' notation by redefining
>| > (>>), (>>=) etc., but unfortunately GHC is quite insistent
>| that 'do' notation quite specifically refers to GHC.Base.Monad
>
>Dylan replies
>
>| I'm surprised that ghc uses the fromInteger and fromRational
>| that are in scope; I thought there was general agreement that
>| it should use the Prelude.from{Integer,Rational} in scope.
>
>Ashley is referring to a GHC extension. Normally, GHC uses
>Prelude.fromInteger etc, regardless of what is in scope. But if you
>say -fno-implicit-prelude, GHC will instead use whatver fromInteger
>is in scope. (This is documented in the manual.)
>
>Ashley's question, as I understand is whether something similar
>could be done for monads.
>
>Answer: I think so, without much bother. I'm beavering away on
>a Haskell workshop paper at the moment, but ping me in a fortnight
>to do it.
>
>Simon
>_______________________________________________
>Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
