> Would it be possible to use the full hierarchical module name?
> There's a much better chance of them being unique.
> ie use
>
> __stginit_Control_Arrow
>
> rather than
>
> __stginit_Arrow
>
> I *assume* that information is avaliable at compile/build time.
Yes, we already do this. However, in your case you had a module called
"Arrow" in gtk2hs, and a module called "Arrow" in the lang package, in
addition to the module "Control.Arrow" in the base package.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
