On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 17:22, Sven Panne wrote: > Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > We've no idea what to do here. In your case it'd be possible to just > > ignore the script, but presumably not so in general. [...] > > I've just made a quick test on my SuSE 9.1 Linux and it seems to be the > case that an explicit "-lpthread" is not necessary anymore, even for > programs using pthread calls. Strange, but handy. :-) Could you try if > things work for you without adding "pthread" to extra_libraries?
That does seem to work, thanks. The joys of linker magic. I guess that solves my immediate problem, but doesn't help answer Simon's question of what we do in general. :-( If we were using .so's for packages rather than .o's then we'd be using the system linker and we wouldn't have the problem, but that is a longer term project. Duncan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
