On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:07, John Sharley wrote: > I note this remark on the Microsoft Research site > (http://research.microsoft.com/projects/ilx/fsharp.aspx) > <quote> > Purely functional languages like Haskell are excellent within certain > niches, but unfortunately some simple programming exercises can quickly turn > into problems that require a PhD. to solve. > </quote> > > Are the Microsoft Research people working on GHC or anyone else on this list > also of this opinion? If so, why?
This is a clear case of FUD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUD Manuel _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
