duncan.coutts: > On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 15:45, scott west wrote: > > I'd settle for unregisterised... it seems every time I run through the > > whole port process I see to do some new wrong thing each time, hehe. I'm > > really just in search of a working ghc implementation for my amd64, > > registered or not (the main difference is the use of architecture > > specific registers and thus performance right?). > > Some ghc nomenclature: unregistered means "half as fast as you'd like it > to be". > > If you're after performance (rather than simply working), you'll need to > wait for a registered build, or if you've got the assembler hacking > skills you can help out.
However, unregisterised amd64 is still as fast as my 2.4Ghz P4 registerised. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users