On 18 February 2005 09:42, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 18 February 2005 01:02, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
>
>> This is a known problem with gcc-2.95.
>> We came across it back in September.
>>
>> It was noticed in the nightly builds:
>>
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-September/035116.html
>>
>> And then we chased it up:
>>
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-September/035122.html
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-September/035134.html
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-September/035259.html
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-September/035268.html
>> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-September/035293.html
>
> Don, thanks for the pointer, I'd completely forgotten about that.
>
> I think I'll be able to install a workaround for 6.4 based on the gcc
> version. I need it at least because FreeBSD 4.x still uses gcc 2.95,
> and AFAIK quite a few folks are still using that platform.
I've put in a workaround for this problem, which will show up in
tonight's STABLE snapshot. It works for me on FreeBSD 4.11 with gcc
2.95.4.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
