On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 12:32 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Duncan Coutts wrote: > > > This route is going to be your best bet. Find any binary version of ghc > > that works on your Solaris and then from there you've broken the > > GHC<->GHC dep cycle. > > Okay. Is there a version that's more likely to work than others? Or > should I try them sequentially from most recent, then go backwards?
I don't know of a 'best' version, so probably just try them in order. I've not actually compiled ghc on Solaris myself the IT people did that (though I have boostrapped from a binary snapshot on Sparc Linux which has most of the same issues as Sparc Solaris). Duncan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
