"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>> But how about having a separate repository for each library > >>>> package? > > The time to mention this would have been a few weeks ago when I proposed > the current scheme :-)
Err, I think I did... > I think it /would/ actually be nicer to split up the repository into > separate packages. However, of the two ways to do this that John > mentioned, only the second is practical IMO - that is, generate the > repositories from CVS. So it's entirely up to John whether he wants to > put the effort in or not. Is there more to this job than just running either cvs2darcs or tailor, then waiting a few days (:-) for it to finish? Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users