joelr1:
> This is using stage2. Does it look any better?
>
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Mon Jul 10 15:11:22 BST 2006
> 952 total tests, which gave rise to
> 4583 test cases, of which
> 11 caused framework failures
> 1099 were skipped
>
> 3185 expected passes
> 24 expected failures
> 0 unexpected passes
> 217 unexpected failures
Not too bad (mips64 is around the same), but not the same as the linux head:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sun Jul 9 22:35:16 BST 2006
1401 total tests, which gave rise to
7573 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failures
1357 were skipped
6056 expected passes
50 expected failures
0 unexpected passes
110 unexpected failures
So the next step would be to diff the two results, and individually run the
tests that failed. Quite possibly many are failing for non-scary reasons (like
missing libs, or missing arch-specific output cases)
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2006-July/048188.html
-- Don
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
