Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello skaller,
Sunday, August 13, 2006, 4:34:14 AM, you wrote:
But the state of the art is then two stages behind the
requirement: Haskell still has to 'world stop' threads
to do a major collection.
is not exactly true. look at "Non-stop Haskell"
(http://www.haskell.org/~simonmar/papers/nonstop.pdf)
i don't know why it is not included in 6.6 or previous version
Simply because it adds overhead (both in runtime and code complexity), and the
benefits are relatively modest.
To comment on another point in this thread: currently the generation 0 GCs
(minor GCs) also stop-the-world, even on a multiprocessor. This is a
significant problem, and we have some ideas for fixing it, but no code yet (it's
a possible intern project, if anyone is interested).
Parallel major GC was worked on by Roshan James during his internship here this
summer, and we have some working code, but it needs a lot more testing and
tuning, and it may be some time before we can incorporate this into the mainline.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
