Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > In general, GHC (like every other compiler that does strictness > analysis) feels free to change non-termination into a call to 'error' > and vice versa. One could change that, but a lot of programs would > become less efficient as a result.
Just to clarify, I'm happy with that behaviour, I just found it surprising. I was looking for an explanation and got one. Thanks! Bertram _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
