On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Nothing deep. Just that "=" means so many things that it seemed better > to use a different notation. >
How about ==? Only one meaning so far, and that both on the term level and equivalent to the constraint. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations. Ivanova is God. And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
