Hello Duncan, Friday, May 23, 2008, 11:55:57 PM, you wrote:
>> > me too. btw, this already present in jhc. inlining doesn't work in any >> > complex case since recursive functions can't be inlined >> >> GHC inlines recursive functions, too, otherwise it could not turn 'foldl' >> and friends into plain machine loops. > As I understand it, if foldl was written in the standard directly way > then ghc would not inline it well, i'm not a True GHC Hacker ;) but i was bitten by this problem in 6.4. i had a lot of SPECIALIZE pragmas in Streams library exactly because INLINE doesn't help. actually, it even does things worser by disabling some other form of optimization, i don't remember which one i have proposal of inlining even recursive functions just for one level of recursion in order to allow to call here specialized version of function. what GHC HQ will say? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
